In our first lecture, we will discuss the objectives and intentions of the course, begin our discussion on terminology and get to know each other.
Figure 1: Photo by Jaromír Kavan
This first lecture consists of two parts, each of which have specific learning objectives.
title | lecturer | part | slides |
---|---|---|---|
Introduction to rbtl | E. Tilley | Part 1 | Access slides on Moodle |
Welcome to the course! | L. Schöbitz | Part 2 | Access slides in browser |
Welcome to the course! | L. Schöbitz | Part 2 | Access slides as PDF |
O’Brien, J., & Thondhlana, G. (2019). Plastic bag use in South Africa: Perceptions, practices and potential intervention strategies. Waste Management, 84, 320-328.
Ferronato, N., Preziosi, G., Portillo, M. A. G., Lizarazu, E. G. G., & Torretta, V. (2020). Assessment of municipal solid waste selective collection scenarios with geographic information systems in Bolivia. Waste Management, 102, 919-931.
Nemathaga, F., Maringa, S., & Chimuka, L. (2008). Hospital solid waste management practices in Limpopo Province, South Africa: A case study of two hospitals. Waste Management, 28(7), 1236-1245.
Pathak, D. R., Mainali, B., Abuel-Naga, H., Angove, M., & Kong, I. (2020). Quantification and characterization of the municipal solid waste for sustainable waste management in newly formed municipalities of Nepal. Waste Management & Research, 38(9), 1007-1018.
Philippe, F., & Culot, M. (2009). Household solid waste generation and characteristics in Cape Haitian city, Republic of Haiti. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54(2), 73-78.
id | title_link | type | category | effort_estimate_min | submission_format | due_date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Week 1 - Hello GitHub | assignment | required | 45 | GitHub | 2022-03-15 |
2 | Read the Syllabus carefully | reading | required | 15 | no submission | |
3 | What is open source? | reading | required | 15 | no submission | |
4 | Excuse Me, Do You Have a Moment to Talk About Version Control? | reading | recommended | 30 | no submission | |
5 | Reproducible? Replicable? Robust? Generalisable? | reading | recommended | 10 | no submission | |
6 | Six arguments why you benefit from reproducible workflows to your research | reading | recommended | 10 | no submission |
If you see mistakes or want to suggest changes, please create an issue on the source repository.
Text and figures are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution CC BY-SA 4.0. Source code is available at https://github.com/rbtl-fs22/website, unless otherwise noted. The figures that have been reused from other sources don't fall under this license and can be recognized by a note in their caption: "Figure from ...".